Enterotomy risk in abdominal wall repair: a prospective study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVES To establish the incidence and predictive factors of enterotomy made during adhesiolysis in abdominal wall repair and to assess the impact of enterotomies and long-lasting adhesiolysis on postoperative morbidity such as sepsis, wound infection, abdominal complications and pneumonia, and socioeconomic costs. BACKGROUND Adhesions frequently complicate surgical repair of abdominal wall hernia. Enterotomies made during adhesiolysis specifically have a large impact on morbidity of patients, especially surgical site infections. Little is known on the incidence and burden of enterotomies and long-lasting adhesiolysis in abdominal wall repair. METHODS Between June 2008 and June 2010 demographics, disease characteristics and perioperative data of all patients undergoing elective abdominal wall repair were included in a prospective cohort study that was focused on adhesiolysis-related problems. A trained researcher observed all surgeries and collected data on adhesion location, tenacity, adhesiolysis time, and inadvertent organ damage such as enterotomies. Primary outcome was the incidence of enterotomy, and predictive factors for enterotomy were assessed through univariate and multivariate analyses. In addition, we evaluated the impact of adhesiolysis and enterotomy on morbidity. RESULTS A cohort of 133 abdominal wall repairs was analyzed. Adhesiolysis was required in 124 (93.2%), with a mean adhesiolysis time of 35.7 ± 29.8 minutes. Thirty-three enterotomies were made in 17 patients (12.8%). Two patients had a delayed diagnosed bowel perforation. Adhesiolysis time, hernia size greater than 10 cm, and fistula were significant predictive factors in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only adhesiolysis time was a significant and independent predictive factor for enterotomy (P = 0.004). Trends toward an increased risk were seen for patients with mesh in situ and hernia size greater than 10 cm. Patients with enterotomy had significantly more urgent reoperations (P = 0.029), and they more often required parenteral feeding (P = 0.037). Moreover, patients with extensive adhesiolysis (adhesiolysis time, >30 minutes) more often suffered from wound infection (9/63 vs 2/70; P = 0.025), abdominal complications (5/63 vs 0/70; P = 0.022), and sepsis (4/63 vs 0/70; P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS One in 8 patients undergoing abdominal wall repair suffer inadvertent enterotomy following adhesiolysis. Adhesiolysis time predicts enterotomy. Morbidity in patients with extensive adhesiolysis and adhesiolysis complicated by enterotomy is high, inducing longer hospital stay and increased health care utilization.
منابع مشابه
Inadvertent Enterotomy in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery
BACKGROUND Inadvertent enterotomy (IE) in laparoscopic abdominal surgery is underreported. Patients with a prior history of laparotomy are at significantly increased risk of enterotomy if another operation is needed. The incidence of enterotomy in laparoscopic surgery may even be greater than that during an open procedure and may go unrecognized due to the limited field of vision. The purpose o...
متن کاملEnterotomy and Mortality Rates of Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: a Review of the Literature
Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia (LVIH) repair is becoming more popular throughout the world. Although individual series have presented their own information, few data have been collected to identify the risk of the most serious complication, enterotomy. A literature review has identified this to occur in 1.78% of patients who undergo this procedure. Large bowel injury represents only...
متن کاملRenal insufficiency after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm reconstruction: An analysis of this risk factor in 45 patients
Abstract Background: Renal insufficiency is a potential complication after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and is a significant risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of this risk factor, before and during operation. Methods: In this prospective study, between 2003 and 2006, 45 patients underwent repair of an infrarena...
متن کاملEfficacy of Polypropylene Mesh Coated with Bioresorbable Membrane (Sepramesh) for the Repair of Abdominal Wall Defects in Horses
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the use of Polypropylene mesh (Prolene) and Sepramesh, a coated Polypropylene mesh with a protective layer of Seprafilm on its visceral side, for the repair of abdominal wall defects in horses. We also aimed to quantify the consequent visceral adhesion and tissue inflammatio Design: Experimental study. Animals: Ten horses. Methods: The horses w...
متن کاملLaparoscopic Hernia Repair: a Two-Port Technique
OBJECTIVE Various ventral and incisional hernia repair techniques exist and have largely replaced the open ones. The purpose of this study was to document the 2-port technique and demonstrate that it is feasible, efficient, and safe. To our knowledge, this is the largest report on this topic to date in the English-language literature. METHODS Forty patients with ventral hernias (VH) or incisi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of surgery
دوره 256 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012